 | | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
(...) hmm ... looks like we got the "ideal" version as it has been projected by the part designers but the part was modified during the production. fact is we stick to the actual part as it comes out of the box and we will have to get rid off the (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
(...) it's a fine prog, anders! nonetheless I really wish it were a part of LDDP and not just a plug in - it doesn't allow polling to a viewer while I edit figures and to me visual feedback is crucial. BTW could you please check why Syncedit wipes (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
Sorry for that mistake W ----- Original Message ----- From: "Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> To: <lugnet.cad.dev.org....ugnet.com> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 5:39 AM Subject: Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
(...) I do agree it is ambiguous (and can't actually remember what was meant even though I believe I drafted that statement...) and the wording should be tightened. Given the non-exceptional rules I assume it means for the duration of being a parts (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
(...) I accept. Thanks. However, I should mention that contrary to what William stated above, I don't meet the requirements for "parts author", and may not meet the "parts reviewer" requirements. (I'm not 100% sure I've submitted five reviews total, (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
