LDraw (www.ldraw.org) : 4126


CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 4126	4125 \| 4127

Subject:	Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date:	Fri, 5 Oct 2007 04:47:40 GMT
Viewed:	4829 times

> The wording is ambiguous about whether the five have to come in the > "one year period" or the "term as a parts reviewer period".) > > --Travis Cobbs I do agree it is ambiguous (and can't actually remember what was meant even though I believe I drafted that statement...) and the wording should be tightened. Given the non-exceptional rules I assume it means for the duration of being a parts reviewer. Tim

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
(...) I would like to think that it meant "5 in the last one year", since we want people who are CURRENTLY active in the LDraw community. That is also the way that I naturally read the sentence. But it can definitely be read either way. And given (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
(...) I accept. Thanks. However, I should mention that contrary to what William stated above, I don't meet the requirements for "parts author", and may not meet the "parts reviewer" requirements. (I'm not 100% sure I've submitted five reviews total, (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

22 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search