 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) That's unfortunate (but what I thought I remembered). I didn't have a lot of luck updating the ldliterc.dat file used by the PT. Even after regenerating all the unofficial part images, 58119's image is still incorrect. I'll have to mess with (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) If you don't (and I suspect that you don't), I'd be happy to help you compile it there (assuming the binaries don't work), but there's a significant catch. Even when rendering snapshots from the command line, it currently still requires a (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.fun
|
|
Well, I guess being cornered for hours by so many LDraw gurus during the summer prompted me to exert some kind of revenge :-) But of course any Lugnet thread counting more than 20 messages is always worth investigating... Jean-Marc (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - MATRIX section updated
|
|
(...) Before I do that, can someone tell me if a 3D transformation matrix that includes shear is still homogeneous? If not, then I'm not going to put it in. --Travis (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) I missed that one. We've got ldview installed on the server? Hmm... Steve (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with part 30208.dat
|
|
Please upload this version to the PT. Only by this it can be corrected completly. It is now so many years an official part and nowbody has realized that it was wrong. Your version works fine as I can see. There are also missing inner lines. So (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - MATRIX section updated
|
|
(...) Hey, could you perhaps toss in the word "homogeneous" when describing that matrix? I tend to find more complete explanations when I add that to my internet searches. Have fun, Don (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) Yeah, it might be time to make the switch. Ldglite has never been updated to use ldconfig.ldr (although it probably wouldn't difficult). It currently only supports the older ldlite config file ldliterc.dat with ldlite COLOR metacommands to (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) consider also a switch to LDView as rendering engine; it does a fine job for the MOTM: (URL) w. (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) That's a good question. The Parts Tracker probably doesn't use ldconfig.ldr, because the image-generator uses a custom script to maintain a combined library of official & unofficial files, which predates ldconfig.ldr. I'm also not sure the (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
