 | | Re: Problem with part 30208.dat
|
|
Please upload this version to the PT. Only by this it can be corrected completly. It is now so many years an official part and nowbody has realized that it was wrong. Your version works fine as I can see. There are also missing inner lines. So (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - MATRIX section updated
|
|
(...) Hey, could you perhaps toss in the word "homogeneous" when describing that matrix? I tend to find more complete explanations when I add that to my internet searches. Have fun, Don (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) Yeah, it might be time to make the switch. Ldglite has never been updated to use ldconfig.ldr (although it probably wouldn't difficult). It currently only supports the older ldlite config file ldliterc.dat with ldlite COLOR metacommands to (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) consider also a switch to LDView as rendering engine; it does a fine job for the MOTM: (URL) w. (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) That's a good question. The Parts Tracker probably doesn't use ldconfig.ldr, because the image-generator uses a custom script to maintain a combined library of official & unofficial files, which predates ldconfig.ldr. I'm also not sure the (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
