|
|
 | | Re: Problem with LPub
|
| (...) Hi Joel, I have been researching this, but had set LPub aside until Brickfest. I'll see what I can sneek in. For now, you could split the MPD file into individual files. Kevin (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Problem with LPub
|
| (...) Hi Joel, This problem keeps coming up again and again (search Lugnet for create_mpd_construction_dats for past discussions). I think Kevin is trying to fix it but I won't speak for him. Tim PS. Kevin, maybe you could put a warning at the top (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Problem with LPub
|
| Hello all, I just downloaded LPub 2.4.7, and have really been enjoying some of the new rendering options. However, when I try to render the complete model for an mpd file, I get an error popup that states "create_mpd_construction_dats: Failed to (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Type numbering of parts with different types
|
| (...) Well, first off, using 'Type X' should be the notation of last resort. The prefered way to note variations of parts is to include a descriptive notation. Sometimes, a descriptive notation is not practical (for whatever reasons). In this case, (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Type numbering of parts with different types
|
| When reviewing some parts with different types, I noticed some had the type number in arabic numbers (like 'Type 1', 'Type 2') in the part titles, while others used roman numbers (like 'Type I, 'Type II'). For consistancy, what kind of numbering (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
