Subject:
|
Re: Type numbering of parts with different types
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:16:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3624 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
> When reviewing some parts with different types, I noticed some had the type
> number in arabic numbers (like 'Type 1', 'Type 2') in the part titles, while
> others used roman numbers (like 'Type I, 'Type II').
>
> For consistancy, what kind of numbering should be used for types?
Well, first off, using 'Type X' should be the notation of last resort. The
prefered way to note variations of parts is to include a descriptive notation.
Sometimes, a descriptive notation is not practical (for whatever reasons). In
this case, use the Type X notation. There is no standard on this point, but I'd
lean toward using standard numeric notation, rather than Roman numerals.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Type numbering of parts with different types
|
| When reviewing some parts with different types, I noticed some had the type number in arabic numbers (like 'Type 1', 'Type 2') in the part titles, while others used roman numbers (like 'Type I, 'Type II'). For consistancy, what kind of numbering (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
