|
|
 | | Re: Lpub Dual Callout
|
| (...) I believe that your solution of multiple identical parts within the same begin/end is the correct solution. I'll make the PLI and BOM processes handle this case correctly. This way each instance gets its own placement and orientation. Kevin (19 years ago, 1-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Lpub Dual Callout
|
| (...) Thinking better (had a sleepless night ;o), this is not a solution. Multiple arrows generating multiple parts in bom/pli is not either: how the multiple submodels would get placed in the model (only one set of coordinates)? Philo (19 years ago, 1-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: 1-8tang.dat?
|
| (...) but the current 1-8tang on the PT has 3 hold votes. This part (...) changed since december last year. Is someone willing to correct (...) It would be rather handy to give us a direct link to this primitive. And then, nice (URL) retro (...) (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
| | | | | 1-8tang.dat?
|
| I am working on a part and I actually need something like a 1-8tang primitive, but the current 1-8tang on the PT has 3 hold votes. This part hasn't been changed since december last year. Is someone willing to correct this primitive? Niels (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: Callout in LPub
|
| (...) Right. That did it! Tnx. Jaco (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
