 | | Re: troubles with automatic Raytracing using L3PAO and POV-Ray 3.1g
|
|
(...) I have the same problem on my Win98SE machines. I think I recall that it's a common problem. (...) I guess that L3PAO is made for an older POV-Ray version (3.0?) and can't locate exactly the file it recognizes POV-Ray with, because it's (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | troubles with automatic Raytracing using L3PAO and POV-Ray 3.1g
|
|
Hallo I installed POV-ray 3.1g and then L3PAO on win XP machine every time I start L3PAO there is a message saying POV-ray couldn't be verified as installed on my computer. Have anybody exeperienced this? Does anybody know what's wrong and how to (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Roadsign Triangle with Men Working, 1 Dirt Pile Pattern
|
|
(...) Strange, because I copied this from the other patterned parts 649p01, 649p02 and 81294. This problem occurs here too. I do not think, however that this is very disturbing? Ortherwise it should be corrected. I will try and take a look at this (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Roadsign Triangle with Men Working, 1 Dirt Pile Pattern
|
|
(...) Jaco! The top corner of the red frame is somehow misaligned comparing to the rounded top corner of the s\649s01.dat. With high zoom factor it can be easily noticed. Otherwise the granularity of the pattern is sufficient. Bye Ampi (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Roadsign Triangle with Men Working, 1 Dirt Pile Pattern [DAT]
|
|
It has been a while, but I have created a new part. Almost done, but I would like an opinion on whether the detail of the pattern would be sufficient. I have posted an image on Brickshelf: (URL) DAT file is attached to this message. Jaco 0 Roadsign (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
