 | | Re: Bugs with the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) First off, a bigger issue with this file is that it is a model, not a part. I feel it goes beyond the idea of a shortcut, or complete assembly. However, to your point. This file uses *3* unofficial files. Yes, they are updates of (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Black colour in new instructions
|
|
(...) Right. Do we want to work that out in lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, or are people OK with the LSC taking the discussion off-lugnet? Steve (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) OK, so let's figure out a better sort order. The possible 'statuses' for files are: - Certified! - Needs Admin review - Needs more votes - Subfiles aren't certified - Hold My thinking when I constructed the list and the sorting was: - Keep the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2706.dat - Technic Action Figure Shoe
|
|
Hey, great to see you (two) are still working on the figure's parts; My Go cart is patiently waiting for a driver :) It looks about right... not much time to play with the part yet though. -Andrew (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) Make deals with people. Trade reviews - you'll look at their files (and offer honest reviews) if they'll look at yours. (...) I'm sorry you've gotten that feeling. My feeling is that the current system gives a lot *more* power to the standard (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
