 | | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) Ok I fixed the problem in the ldlist plugin and replaced the zip file. Turns out I had to use the WINAPI convention and add an alias to the .def file to make LDDP happy. I wonder if it's a similar calling convention problem with the track and (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) I think he might have mentioned an older version of Delphi. Anyhow, I suspect it may be an issue with Delphi vs gcc. I got my ldlist wrapper plugin working in ldglite, but it doesn't work in LDDP. I added some debugging and saw LDDP call (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | A Plea from a greenhorn (Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...)
|
|
(...) I agree, it is a little frustrating. I'm still a fledgeling author, and I need to learn what I'm doing wrong. Having somebody come through and make these edits before I get a chance to look is not making me a better author. I need to be able (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
(...) I have no idea what the problem could be unless Niel used an older version of the plugin code. This shouldn't be an issue with Delphi. --Orion P.S. All the current developers at the LDDP project are using Delphi 6 or higher. As far as what (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Another LDDP plugin question.
|
|
I'm not sure what the problem is, but I'm running into memory problems with some of the LDDP plugins. I wonder if it's some sort of incompatibility with a particular version of Delphi used to build the plugins. Orion's plugins don't exhibit the (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New part - Castle Wall
|
|
(...) It's a little bit risky to make a part only from instruction scans. But never mind it's nearly correct. I'll send you a picture from the bottom. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part - Castle Wall
|
|
Dear All, I hit on an idea to build CAD model of Royal Knight's Castle from set 6090. In certain moment I found that one part from this set has been never created, so I decided to create it myself. It is a part 6055 named "Castle Wall 6 x 6 x 6 (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) I can understand you. But I think primitives with are used by a lot of parts should be available to change by anyone. In the other hand a _part_ (or subpart) should never changed if it's on the PT. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) I agree that it affects every line in the part but my point is the triviality of the moving the part. If the origin is 1 LDU off of what it should be, it's fairly trivial to move it. -Orion (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
(...) Nah, that's not true. I've had teeth pulled -- it was easier than getting you to review! ;) Steve (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
