 | | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) Another suggestion is using the dash '-' and have an additional letter give some more information. a = adjacent p = parallel ... (more?) Niels (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Large LDraw/MPD Files?
|
|
(...) *drool* I'm running it under Win2k, but with only 256mb RAM. Need to upgrade... not too familiar with prices though, and it's a laptop, so bound to be pricey. I'd love to upgrade the HD too...20 GB just ain't enough for my MP3 usage ;-) I've (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Large LDraw/MPD Files?
|
|
You can get MLCAD's response time on refreshes to be much snappier by reducing the size of the 3D window. The isometrics don't take much processing power, even with large numbers of pieces. Also try running it under Win2k with lots'a ram. Win 98 (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Mac LDraw Viewer comments
|
|
Well, I am useless when it comes to prgraming, but I can pretend that I am performing a valuable service by reporting my findings for beta software. I started up LDraw Viewer 0.3.1 on a PowerBook G3 (FireWire), ATI(AGP) 128 bit Rage Mobility with 8 (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Large LDraw/MPD Files?
|
|
(...) I meant basically what you just said. Ldglite doesn't create a new copy of the part each time it is used; LDView does. I do this for various reasons, but I believe that when I go back and revisit those reasons now with the advantage of (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
