 | | *** Start celebrating .... NOW
|
|
Hi, (URL) reasons for celebration. First of all there is MLCad V3.00: It comes with a new look and four integrated generators for minifigs, rubber bands, springs and flexible hoses. Check it out :-) There is also the beginning of the developer (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad) !
|
| |
| | Re: LPub Instruction Images errors help
|
|
I figured out what my problem was, in my POVRAY.ini file I had the settings initial_frame = 0 final_frame = 0 initial_clock = 0 final_clock = 0 included, so POVRAY kept rending the images with Stepping and putting an number on the end of my .bmp (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst)
|
| |
| | Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
|
(...) Alas, I did not know that. After your telling me, I dug around the (URL) site and found: (URL) must have read that a long time ago and forgotten it. Maybe a GUI tweak to specify the save format? I don't know. I will tell my friend that .DAT (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
|
(...) www.brickswest.com Feb 14-17, Carlsbad, CA. You still in the LA area? -Tim (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
|
(...) What do you mean by that? LeoCAD has been able to read/write .dat files for years. (...) I use the keyboard exclusively too but I never thought that following the LEdit keys was so important to other people. I'll work on that. Leonardo (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
|
(...) Leonardo: Two comments: 1. One of my fellow BayLUG members is a *very* pro-Linux. Much to my suprise he wound up using MLCAD to do his MOC instruction manuals. When I asked him "why?", his response has that LeoCAD could not read and write (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
|
(...) [...] (...) Gustavo: I grabbed the binary zip, unpacked it, and then noticed that it was Windows. I kicked Windows out of my house about 5 years ago ;-) I grabbed the source and attempted to compile them under a stock Red Hat 7.3 distribution (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
|
(...) Looks pretty good, I haven't had much time to try it (at work now) so I didn't understand very well how to connect 2 bricks but somehow I was able to connect them and it looked nice. (...) When/where is it going to be? (...) What's confusing (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
|
(...) This is cool! I'd love to see this develop further. Leo - if you're reading, are you coming to BricksWest?? I'd love to sit down face to face again and discuss the future of LeoCAD. (...) This is still the main reason I don't use LeoCAD as an (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LeoCAM alpha release
|
|
(...) snip (...) This is pretty amazing. Once you get the hang of it, you can add parts to a model so quickly. Also, once two parts are "connected," moving or rotating one part moves both parts together, like a submodel. Now if I could just figure (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub Instruction Images errors help
|
|
Hi James, Please email me two files and some information: 1. The test.ldr file 2. config.lpb from the directory in which you installed Lpub 3. The name of the full path which test.ldr exists. 4. The version of LPub you used. You can send these (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst)
|
| |
| | LPub Instruction Images errors help
|
|
I have a test project called test.ldr with 4 steps. When I run LPub and use the Instruction Images feature everything seems to go just fine for the first step. But after the first step is rendered I get the error message "Image file test.bmp not (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst)
|
| |
| | Question
|
|
I am not sure if this is the proper place to post this question, but currently on Renderosity.com in the free stuff section is a Bryce obp for download of the Blacktron I 6876 Alienator. When you follow the link to download it appears that he is (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Znap Parts
|
|
(...) Try: (URL) find some references to primitives and the flexible axle and stuff. IN particular: (URL) time ago someone made up a good start. They did some of the connectors, and some of the simple beams. These beams have the key end connection (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Znap Parts
|
|
Have any of the Znap parts been drawn up yet? Joseph (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LeoCAM alpha release
|
|
Hi all: I'm very glad to announce the first alpha release of LeoCAM, a CAD derived from LeoCAD that incorporates mechanical features in it. This project is being developped by Francisco Gonzalez Garcia as his undergraduate final project at the (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | ISCC II Moc: MAYA Land
|
|
Hi everybody, Just wanted to interest you all, with the MOC I constructed (well not built due to lack of parts). I was always impressed by the astonishing piramids of the Mayas and wanted to built those for ages. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.build.ancient, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: How do I write a header file for an updated part...
|
|
(...) Good idea. I'll do that before I send the parts in. (...) Hm, you think the 1x4 brick is common enough? Methinks the answer is yes- I'll separate the unfaced portion. I'm also submitting a BFC'd box4t because I used that for the brick's body. (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question/problem with some flag parts
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure there is not a 6 x 3 1/3 flag, and seeing as the original author titled it "6 x 4" I suspect this was just an error in authoring (and review !). I'll liaise with the author to arrange a fix. Chris (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How do I write a header file for an updated part...
|
|
(...) I've not discussed with Steve, but I'd go for option 2 - write a new header but credit the previous author in a subsidiary comment. If the existing author is still active, it would be polite to let them know what you're doing. Please re-use (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
