 | | Re: Segmented parts (ie hoses and flex tubes)
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) I agree, I did that with the hoses on my loco (URL) and it seems the best solution. ROSCO (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Segmented parts (ie hoses and flex tubes)
|
|
(...) No, moving the hose segments to parts/s/ would NOT prevent the shrinkage problem. It doesn't matter whether a part is located in PARTS or PARTS/S, it is still considered as a part. Whenever a (sub-)part is referenced from another part, it is (...) (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
(...) Adding a focal length won't make a POV rendering look that good, though. The reason it looks so good is because the renderer that rendered it appears to be very very good. I imagine the fact that is illuminated with an area light is in large (...) (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Signal tower ( was: santa fe -poster- in progress )
|
|
(...) um.... actually.. 1 multi colored one. the design is actually about 3 to 4 years old , seen here (URL) on my trains page. the page is old and hasnt been updated yet (...) (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: santa fe -poster- in progress
|
|
"Thomas Burger" <tburger32@aol.com> wrote in message news:H1Irsq.9nw@lugnet.com... (...) lighting. (...) that model! So how many have you actually built? ;-) Cary Clark and I were discussing this very item earlier today and agreed that it would (...) (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.trains)
|
