 | | Updated 30399.dat [DAT]
|
|
I have fixed the duplicated lines according to L3P. Is this the correct name? Also, do I need to submit this to the tracker? If so, how do I get an account? I hope this one is correct, I don't think any of the parts that I have made have been OK'd. (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Updated 30400.dat [DAT]
|
|
I fixed this one's duplicated lines as well. 0 Brick 4 x 18 0 Name: 30400.dat 0 Author: Ronald Scott Moody <RonaldScottMoody@netscape.net> 0 Unofficial Element 0 1 16 120 4 20 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 160 4 20 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Trouble with POV 3.5
|
|
(...) I have found 3.5 to be almost twice as fast as 3.1 with the same files - tested on a PII, P3 and P4. Most incompatabilities can be removed with the version directive. (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Trouble with POV 3.5
|
|
<snip> (...) Try this link: (URL) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: ASSOCIATE (was: Re: Renaming of 2916.dat)
|
|
(...) WAY better than using naming to overload. 2916 and 2917 get at best a very weak association if they have train in their name. With the ASSOCIATE keyword extension it becomes quite explicit what their connection is. (and parts can also have (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ASSOCIATE (was: Re: Renaming of 2916.dat)
|
|
(...) Yes. Play well, Jacob (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Trouble with POV 3.5
|
|
(...) Can't help it, I'm an upgrade junkie. Been that way for years :) Anyway, is there a good tutorial on MegaPOV? I have not used that yet, still using L3P. (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | ASSOCIATE (was: Re: Renaming of 2916.dat)
|
|
(...) Hmm. Interesting idea. So part 3937 (URL) might have an entry like: 0 ASSOCIATE 3938 6134 and part 3938 (URL) might have: 0 ASSOCIATE 3937 2440 (of course, these examples capture information that otherwise might be captured by a connectivity (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part in progress - Baseplate 32 x 32 with Craters
|
|
(...) Wow! I think you've definitely got sufficient detail there. (...) If you include a comment in the part file, indicating that the bottom is modeled as a flat surface to reduce the size/complexity of the part, I think that would be alright. (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: CMDLINE Meta-statement
|
|
(...) The purpose is to specify viewing characteristics for a part that should be the default, but we don't want to hard-code into the part itself. Generally, it's used to specify the 'correct' color for patterned parts. So a patterned minifig head (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
