 | | Re: [Parts Tracker] Re-numbering "Star Wars" patterns...
|
|
(...) :p That animation is older than the minifig parts. As is the animated file on this page: (URL) (well, ok, that is older than *some* of the minifig parts). Steve (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part x176
|
|
(...) Hey Ross: sorry I didn't really get the point of your email -- I was in a rush, and didn't look at the parts. Otherwise, I would have said then, what I'm going to say now. Do *not* use the Peeron 'x' numbers as the basis for LDraw parts! The (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems submitting upadeted versions of official parts?
|
|
(...) Actually, I have to say, Mark's been pretty darn patient. :) But thanks for sticking up for me and the parts tracker. Steve (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Firelogo
|
|
(...) Yes, it would be better if the firelogo was a subpart, so it could be reused. The main problem with 4209p01 is it is coded poorly. As you said, the pattern is setup like a sticker. The files should be modified - the printed area should be (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: /p file for 1/2 stud? [DAT]
|
|
(...) Do you mean like this? 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 2-4edge.dat 1 16 0 -4 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 2-4edge.dat 1 16 0 -4 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 2-4disc.dat 1 16 0 -4 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 6 2-4cyli.dat Nope, there's nothing like that. Are there many parts (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
