|
|
 | | Re: Female Ldraw Parts
|
| (...) So then, the parts referred to upthread fit that definition? That's part of what I am confused about. Do these exist in real life or not? (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
| All the Horse files, and most of the primitives updated with BFC'ness, are now certified! The one primitive not yet certified is p\48\1-4ndis.dat, but it is not the sole hold-up for any files. Over the next few days, I'll be working on getting the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Female Ldraw Parts
|
| (...) Larry, You are correct. The term "unofficial file/part/subfile/[whatever]" does in fact mean "not yet released" or "not yet approved for release". To the best of my understanding, we've made no provision for any part that does not truly exist. (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
| (...) Actually, transparent surface should work fine. As long as they are set to write to the Z buffer when drawn, and their outlines are drawn with Z buffer testing enabled, they should work fine. The wireframe parts that aren't supposed to be (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
| (...) One problem: transparent surfaces would show the wireframe backside. :\ Steve (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
