 | | Fixed Part: 604.dat - Window 1 x 6 x 3 Panorama [DAT]
|
|
0 Window 1 x 6 x 3 Panorama 0 Name: 604.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part Fix 1 16 40 72 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2-4edge.dat 1 16 20 72 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2-4edge.dat 1 16 0 72 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2-4edge.dat 1 16 -20 72 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 32087.dat - Train Track Cross
|
|
(...) And here I though that the LDRAW Parts GOD had stopped listen to my prayers! THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!! I can't talk about the rest of the foks but I've been waiting f-o-r-e-v-e-r for the PARTS GODS to cerate this and other track pieces. AHui (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Subfiles - Question
|
|
The the following Lugnet post and the follow-on reply. I think it gives a pretty good discussion of subparts vs. inlineing. (URL) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30248 Helicopter skids (WAS) Re: Looking for parts
|
|
(...) OK, done. I have rotated it 90 degrees and submitted the file to the Tracker. As I don't know whether is OK or not to submit other people's parts, I added a note telling this, just to have the proceeding tried in a pilot case. /Tore (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Subfiles - Question
|
|
Hello, Can someone tell me what the criteria is to create a subpart, instead of copying the whole code and rotate it a few times? I'm creating the 32087.dat file (see previous message or goto : (URL) ) and can tear the main file into different (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 32087.dat - Train Track Cross
|
|
Hi, For the Train freeks, there's something comming up. For a preview, goto : (URL) still have some work to do, but it gives you a perview from what it's gone be. Regards, Ludo (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30248 Helicopter skids (WAS) Re: Looking for parts
|
|
(...) The part definitely hasn't been made official yet. A quick check on the parts tracker doesn't turn up a file either. If you want to finish this and submit it, that would be Very Cool. :) Steve (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30248 Helicopter skids (WAS) Re: Looking for parts
|
|
(...) Some bases are correctly lined up, some aren't. I agree with Steve here, it sohould be rotated. Has this part been officialed yet? I still don't have it in my Parts directory, and was just about to model it when I made a search and found it (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Reviewing Parts FAQ
|
|
Based on this FAQ, I get the notion that BFC is required not optional. Maybe a rewording is in order. Something like: What should I look for when I review a part? . . . . Check the Part for correct BFC (if the part is intended to be BFC complient) (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Temporary Parts Tracker is Closed
|
|
My temporary parts tracker is now closed. The reason why I couldn't close it or fulfill remove requests until now is problems with ftp access. I wish to thank you all for the contributions and visits. /Tore (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
