 | | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
Hello Tore, (...) Open, (...) it (...) Hmm. not here. Even after a restart it stays in that dir ( you have to have already opened a file from there). (...) colour (...) Ok.. I will change that. (...) I did that. ;.) Can you send me an example file (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | elimination of theme categories - is it time?
|
|
A while ago, I posted a couple of messages: - "elimination of theme categories - Castle" ("(URL) - "elimination of theme categories - Space (pt. 1)" ("(URL) end result was, we wanted to wait until the new parts tracker was implemented. Well, the new (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) How about a user defined button or two? I did the same thing with ldglite.exe, but then I wanted to add a few commandline args and stick it into a batch file, but calling it LDView.bat didn't fool LDDesignPad. Just imagine allowing the user to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) Yes, as long as you run the program. But when I've restarted program, it's back to My Documents. About the inlining function: The colour 16 should be replaced by the colour code of the original line. Also, there is something wrong with the (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Will LMPL be Simulation-approach or Usage-approach ?
|
|
Hi Láng Attila D. Hi Kiss Attila Csongor, Do not forget to download Spiderbot.dat (in lugnet.cad.models) The debate becomes VERY interesting. We embody two different well-known approaches. First : the Simulation approach. Things are nothing but (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
Hello Tore, (...) Thank you very much! (...) Ok.. Next version there will be a button for this. ;) (...) browsed (...) It always is using the directory where you last opened a file. At least it does it here.. i will check on it. (...) you (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville: Authors unknown
|
|
Thanks, John! Long time, no seeing. /Tore (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
Hello Carsten, In deed a great program! Hassle-free installation, opens as fast as NotePad, drag-n-drop files into workspace. I miss an L3Lab button, but since I don't use LDView, I renamed a copy of L3Lab.exe to LDView.exe and thus fooled (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Spiderbot and current state of my ALM (stage 3) project [DAT]
|
|
Here is the Spiderbot DAT file with groups and rotation points, as saved by MLCad. The actual temporary draft for ALM (stage 3) is in my previous post. Damien 0 Spiderbot: My first ALM specification 0 Author: damien.guichard@wanadoo.fr 0 ROTATION (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Re[2]: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
(...) Hello Láng Attila D. Hello Kiss Attila Csongor, Now you speak about layers. That is precisely what I called "multiple syntax levels". Software layers are known to be very bad for software engineering and design in general. On the contrary, ALM (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
