 | | Re: Good news (and l3p feature request)
|
|
(...) in my PATH. Oops! No wonder it seemed like such a good idea. I must have read all about it already in the release notes. Don (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) So, does anyone know what the Danish term is? Or the part names? (...) Nod, exactly. And, since we're working in English, with translations or totally different names, it's possibly worse. By 'worse', I mean that I expect that part names in (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) :p Sorry, this is a one-name system. Although, after browsing the parts reference at Rene Hoffmeister's site -- (URL) -- I've been wondering about a multi-language parts registry/database. (...) Nod, yes. (...) Yes, there is. It's 32523, and (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news (and l3p feature request)
|
|
(...) It has worked for me since June 2000: (URL) "Support for hi-res primitives Primitives in P\48 and future numeric subdirectories of P are also supported. L3P skips any digit-only directory before attempting primitive substitution, and thus (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) OK. I generally use 'rod' as a straight synonym for 'bar'. If some other people like 'Technic Rod', then let's go with that. (...) In that case, can we move the 'Brick with pin(s)' parts to Technic Brick? (...) Oooo, cool. :) So it *is* a (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) Sorry, I was being too terse. I meant 'technic brick', not just plain 'brick'. Likewise, 'technic beam', not just 'beam'. (...) That's a possibility. Organization-wise, I'd like to split Technic up into two or more categories, just because (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) Yes, but it passes the "Is it?" test. This is the test we'd have to use to account for the Technic and Slope categories found in the LDraw parts library. Technic and Slope are both adjectives, as used in part names. We've got parts like (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Horse parts in the parts tracker
|
|
Hi, I've put now the horse parts 4492-4494 and the subparts into the parts tracker. Sascha (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news (and l3p feature request)
|
|
(...) (URL) figured l3p would substitute smooth cylinders for the 48/1-4cyli.dat primitives to make the tank look much more realistic (like this): (URL) l3p doesn't seem to substitute for the hires primitives so I had to remove the 48/ from all the (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Good news (and for some maybe bad)
|
|
Hi, The site isn't updated yet, but for those who want, you can now download the new (corrected) Train Poster (just go to the posters section and click the preffered size). The dates are all right now (thanks to Lego Denmark!) and all the trains who (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
