 | | Re: Another LDrawn town (Was: Another house for datville?)
|
|
(...) I'm more interested in the methods he used, so that I can replicate it. (...) I think growing interest via this method might be exponential, instead of linear (as is true of the current method). (...) I really think that would be a better idea (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: About installing/Reinstalling Ldraw and about datville
|
|
Here's a question that may sound strange, but I'll explain why I'm asking it at the bottom of this message. Does anyone know how long it takes to render Datsville vs. rendering each submodel within Datsville seperately? I was thinking, that with (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Parts list bug?
|
|
I am running MLCad 2.00 R 4 and I think I may have found a bug in the report for parts I have a large model with several submodels. If I check parts per step and leave submodels unchecked it seems to generate a correct list for the main model. But (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Parts list bug?
|
|
I am running MLCad 2.00 R 4 and I think I may have found a bug in the report for parts I have a large model with several submodels. If I check parts per step and leave submodels unchecked it seems to generate a correct list for the main model. But (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 1749 Unnamed
|
|
Do you have these parts anywhere ? Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:386F45F8.3BEE41...ail.com... (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
