|
|
 | | Re: I'm back...
|
| (...) It should work fine with IE, I never actually tested the site with Netscape personally, glad to know it works though. Did all the spacing look alright with Netscape? (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | Re: Is there any benefit...
|
| (...) Yeah, I wasn't thinking of a large-scale rewrite, but I was curious. (...) I'm not at all code-savvy, but I'd help where possible. Dave! (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Is there any benefit...
|
| ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:54 AM Subject: Re: Is there any benefit... (...) most (...) recursing (...) But (...) It's not worth the trouble: (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Is there any benefit...
|
| (...) The main advantage would be saving a few bytes of file space. Which is most significant to the download process, since we've got about 3MB of data, between ldraw.exe and complete.exe. The rendering time would be *mostly* unaffected. On the on (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | set 1818 CORRECTED still [incomplete] no minifig [DAT]
|
| Ok, here is an MPD of the set i posted earlier. My first DAT had no wings! (thanks Tore) So it looks like I had to do an MPD file. Here it is. I went ahead and added the rest of the set. however it is still incomplete because the small car is (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
|
