 | | Re: Proposal
|
|
(...) How about these: ldr - LDraw (dat) files mpd - Multi-Part lDraw files ldl - files with LDLite language extensions lds - LDScript files mlc - files with MLCad language extensions Steve (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal
|
|
(...) Erg. The .DAT extension is pretty much needed by all tools in use. And the original tools are still used quite a bit, especially in cases where tool flexability is more important than a GUI. (i.e. I still use LEdit to model tank treads, since (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal
|
|
(...) I think you could use .mpd Many of the tools already accept this extension, and I believe (correct me if I am wrong someone) that you can rename your model files, and any model files you download, to use this extension. Of course parts and (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Broken Links on Download page?
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:GCq713.IJ2@lugnet.com... (...) playing with changing all file names to .shtml and making links from the .html extensions. Jacob, can you fix this? Is this even the problem? -Tim (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Proposal
|
|
I've got a bit of a problem with the LDraw derived software. I love the tools I use. My problem is with the unfortunate choice of filename extension. When LDraw/LEdit were written, it didn't really matter much. However, nowadays file (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Broken Links on Download page?
|
|
Maybe it's my system, or just a temporary issue, but the following two URLs both came up broken just now. (URL) the following URL works just fine: (URL) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Update Progress
|
|
(...) Argh, I remembered about those, and still didn't kill the old files. Thanks for pointing this out. Steve (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Developers Wanted
|
|
(...) Actually, much of the functionality is in the prototype. The major missing pieces are: 1. Unofficial/ad-hoc part downloading 2. Release packaging 3. Administrator override of author/reviewer functions (ie, the admin can perform any function) (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community...
|
|
Tim, Your article is well written and will hopefully quell some of the negative noise being made out there. Thank you for including LDMC, also. James and I are doing what we can to make LDMC a force to be reckoned with. Your help has been (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community...
|
|
Hello - I have put up a new article outlining the past progress, current efforts, and future possibilities of the LDraw community. Enjoy! (URL) Courtney - tim@ldraw.org (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Update Progress
|
|
(...) Watch out here, Franklin submitted the SW heads twice, once without the P and a three digit pattern number, then he resent them with the two letter pattern code. Maybe the non-P parts should be ignored? Dan (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Developers Wanted
|
|
I got a question in email, and I thought the answer would be of general interest. The question: (...) The answer: In short, very loose form, the main workflow is: Process 1: Author uploads file -> Reviewers check out file -> Reviewers check/certify (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Update Progress
|
|
Bravo! -Chuck (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Unofficial Update Progress
|
|
I am working on an 'unofficial update' page. Just to have a handle for it, I'm labeling it 'update 2001-01', although after update 2001-02, the unofficial update will go away, cease to exist, become as though it never was. Some things that I am (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
(...) Paul, I don't know if you saw earlier messages about the Part Tracker, but there was some discussion about whether or not we could use CVS as a backend to an automated system. What do you think? There are a number of features we need that (I (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Developers Wanted
|
|
(...) This "problem" seems to be quite familiar to a lot of us ;-) (...) (d) I looked at it, but it was practically only GUI stuff without the necessary functionality, and I'm not the right guy to comment on GUIs... (...) Yes, that would have been (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Developers Wanted
|
|
(...) Right now, it's a monolithic project; there hasn't been any segmentation of tasks. That's mostly my fault; I haven't reviewed the progress Dan has made, so I can't say where there's a need for work. It's also an artifact of not having a good (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Introducing Hammerhead, another COG-shifting walking biped
|
|
Hi all, Just wanted to let you know that I've updated the TechPup site to include Hammerhead, a mono-engine, COF-shifting walking biped. I've also included the dat file plus printed instructions. Unfortunately, Vision Command will NOT work on my (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw parts as 3D objects
|
|
Hi Matthew, I once played with converting parts to 3DMF files. I used Perl to translate them. It's far from perfect but read my message, some of the URLs are still live and lead to some graphics: (URL) this point it would be easy to export 3DMF from (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Pictures From Big April 28th Southern California Meeting
|
|
(...) It's going to be hard to get very much out of us, because I saw how well structured your code was and how easy it was to make changes. Crying "it's hard, you have to pay a lot" will fall flat. I know better. :-) ++Lar (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
