 | | Re: LCAD/LDraw.org Formal Organization
|
|
(...) Plus the fact an informal group would have difficulty enforcing such a licence agrement... Even the FSF (ie GNU's managment group) is an 'organisation'. (...) Yes. Agree (...) What model where you thinking of using? (...) Not Todd ? (...) (...) (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Let's Do It
|
|
(...) Much appreciated -- it pays bills better than majoring in history would have. (...) I'm ready -- just tell me where to go to get started and a list of specific essays, opening paragraphs, descriptions you want. Since I am not an HTML expert I (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LCAD/LDraw.org Formal Organization
|
|
"Burkhard Schloemer" <BuS1503@muenster.de> wrote in message news:G8B1DI.DBo@lugnet.com... (...) possible. Hi Burkhard - There will always be parts authors and official additions as long as there is a desire to create new parts. We're just laying (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LCAD/LDraw.org Formal Organization
|
|
Do whatever you want, but please return to creating new parts. Except for a couple of decorated elements there wasn't much new worth mentioning in the past weeks. Thanks to all who spend time for creating DAT-parts, making my "work" possible. Primus (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New Part: 4858p90.dat - Wedge 4 x 4 with Classic Space Pattern [DAT]
|
|
Here is the third of three more classic space decorated parts. Does this complete the set of classic spaces decorated parts? Chris 0 Wedge 4 x 4 with Classic Space Pattern 0 Name: 4858p90.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3939p91.dat - Slope Brick 33 3 x 6 with Classic Space Pattern Large [DAT]
|
|
Here is the second of three more classic space decorated parts. 0 Slope Brick 33 3 x 6 with Classic Space Pattern Large 0 Name: 3939p91.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Element 2 24 56 24 6 44 24 6 2 24 44 24 6 44 24 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3939p90.dat - Slope Brick 33 3 x 6 with Classic Space Pattern Small [DAT]
|
|
Here is the first of three more classic space decorated parts. 0 Slope Brick 33 3 x 6 with Classic Space Pattern Small 0 Name: 3939p90.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Element 2 24 56 24 6 44 24 6 2 24 44 24 6 44 24 -46 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3901.dat - Minifig Hair Male [DAT]
|
|
Here is the best I can do at the moment on the minifig short hair. It is not as good as I would like it to be, as I need to figure out a better way of measuring these asymetric curved surfaces. I hope it is of some use as it stands. 0 Minifig Hair (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | parts request
|
|
to my knowledge this part has never been done, from set 6394, the blue car wash parts im looking for. (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO, future and other
|
|
Great to have you back in the community Lutz. Gotta love your parts ;) Greetz, Jay (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent Discussion, Well Met
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G8ALC8.CMF@lugnet.com... (...) Well put Lar. Pat - since you are experienced in technical writing, how would you like to help the site in the area of Reference and Get Started? We (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent Discussion, Well Met
|
|
(...) I have no official standing to delegate anything but if someone doesn't jump up and latch on to you I will be very surprised, as there are a number of areas within the site and elsewhere, where either word smithing, or worse, out and out (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Excellent Discussion, Well Met
|
|
When I wrote the original reply to the proposal last Friday, I knew what I was letting myself in for and braced very hard this morning for the onslaught of Pandora's Box. However, after reading every followup in the thread, I must say that I am (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | 6984 galactic mediator alternate model [DAT]
|
|
here's an addition to the space police ii lineup. the front half of the ship is a breakaway pod that can disconnect from the rear "wing" craft. 0 Boromir and Longsword - 6984 Galactic Mediator Alternate 0 Name: BOROMIR.DAT 0 Author: Joseph Gonzalez (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO, future and other
|
|
(...) Hi, Lutz! Nice to have you back around. :) Steve (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on transparent printed parts
|
|
(...) Yah, that'd be the way to go. Steve (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Math.. I'm making my head hurt...
|
|
(...) Y'all aren't helping me any. "Close only counts in horseshoes and hand-grenades". A name change is a name change is a name change. There are some 35 slope bricks with the wrong angle encoded into their names. And no one noticed it (or at least (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Battle Droid for DDK
|
|
Hi all, I have been working on the Battle Droid for the Droid Developers Kit and have uploaded the following image of how it currently looks. This is my first attempt at using MLCad, l3p & POV. Great applications when used together - or (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Math.. I'm making my head hurt...
|
|
(...) Shouldn't this be: 1x2x3 | 17:5 73.610460° Anyways, I've checked out most of the these calculations and measurements and they seem correct to me. - Mladen (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Math.. I'm making my head hurt...
|
|
(...) d'Oh! -- Yes, you're absolutely right -- thank you for the correction! (And I had this funny feeling when I posted that I was doing something wrong in the measurement. The vertical base part is 1/6 brick height, not 1/2 of 1/16.) --Todd (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
