 | | Parts Request: Please Read
|
|
Can/has some one modeled these parts: 1.) 32146 Tyre Medium hard (has: 30 4x14 printed on it) 2.) 32527 Technic panel #5 3.) 32528 Technic panel #6 (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: x475.dat, "Minifig Hat Tri-Corner"
|
|
(...) Could you provide an additional "comple shortcut"? I think it would make working with your part easier for other people. Btw, the hat, as seen on brickshelf, looks fine ;-) Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: work-in-progress: pirate tri-corner hat
|
|
(...) ("(URL) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x475.dat, "Minifig Hat Tri-Corner" [DAT]
|
|
As promised elsewhere ("(URL) is the finalized version of the pirate's tricorner hat! ;-) I hope y'all like this, 'cuz it took me several months (on and off) to do this one! :-P For reference, if you'd like to use this with the small feather-plume, (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Duplo parts?
|
|
(...) No, it's correct. If they were thicker, you wouldn't be able to put Duplo bricks on top of System bricks. (...) The stud height has changed over the years. The newer ones are quite close to 11. I haven't checked the older ones that closely. (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Duplo parts?
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts Steve Bliss wrote... (...) Yup... :) (...) There is: Primitive substitution! I found out that we (mis)use stud4.dat by scaling its height by 5 in bricks! (and other factors in other parts) If I add a rounded edge to (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Updated Part: 3001_d.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4 [DAT]
|
|
2nd reply to my own post... After realizing that the inner bits aren't really all that hard (time-consuming, perhaps, but not too hard), I added the interior ribs and associated lines. I hadn't planned on doing this today, but it's been quiet around (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: January LDraw MOTM Competition
|
|
Here is a copy of the tutorial I'm going to submit on camera angles: Free-Form Camera Positioning with MLCAD, L3P, and POV-RAY One of the hardest issues to grasp when starting out with MLCAD, L3P, and POV-RAY is figuring out how to position the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Free-Form Camera Positioning with MLCAD, L3P, and POV-RAY
|
|
Yes - you are right. I was confused by some of the scaling and rotation primatives at the end of the .pov ray file. I'll change this. thanks Lars C. Hassing <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:G620En.FGp@lugnet.com... (...) If (...) point (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: January LDraw MOTM Competition
|
|
Yeah - I wasn't sure what to submit either. The long shot shows the overall construction the best (when you bring up the enlarged picture), but its certainly not very impressive for the thumbnail. Any suggestions? By the way, if you have ideas on (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Steering
|
|
(...) Well, I did, but the suspension has no droop in it to cut down on hard angles, and the shocks aren't in yet. Probably some errors. I only got to step 24. Email me if you want it. Rob (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: January LDraw MOTM Competition
|
|
I submitted something last month but voted for someone else's model as well! Ryan Farrington <ryanjf@ifriendly.com> wrote in message news:003e01c07012$9f...dly.com... (...) own (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw MOTM Winner for January 2001
|
|
In case anyone is interested, my other CAD stuff is here: (URL) I'm happy to answer any questions regarding the construction of this or other models. Brad Terry K <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G6ML35.Izo@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Repost: would some one model these parts??
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3001_d.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4
|
|
Whoops- I forgot to add something... this is a working copy only. It certainly needs work. Mainly, it has none of the interior ribs. I'm just posting it because I am already using it as a standin piece right now. If someone else wants to do it (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus, 1-inner Radius, 2-outer radius
|
|
Paul (et al), Sorry I haven't replied to this message, I've been meaning to, but I didn't want to rush out a quick reply without thinking things through. I'm not sure I've thought things through thoroughly, but I thought I'd at least throw this out. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3001_d.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4 [DAT]
|
|
Again, I'm not an expert on naming conventions. But it makes sense to me to name a Duplo piece after the corresponding System piece and append it with "_d". But if someone more up on this sort of thing has a better idea, by all means correct me (not (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Primitive: Stud4du.dat Duplo bottom tube [DAT]
|
|
I'm not terribly familiar with the naming conventions for parts, so I expect this will need a different name and/or filename... This is the bottom tube for Duplo parts. Note that it is not just a doubled System tube. The inner diameter is (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Lions face cornice/facade piece ?
|
|
Has anyone done the Lions face cornice/facade piece from the 2000 Castle series ? In any case, I was able to determine the part number. Its stamped deep within one of the two bottom channels... 30274 Ray l#124 (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive: Studdu2.dat Duplo Stud
|
|
This part looks good to me, although the geometry is clearly a combination between older Duplo parts and newer Duplo parts. The OD is clearly correct because it exactly doubles a System stud. You can demonstrate with a pair of plates that the space (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
