|
|
 | | Re: 3069p25.dat, now POV-RAY friendly! ;-)
|
| (...) Done. (...) Done. (...) Done. (...) OK, but I left in "button" (singular). ;-) (...) Oops. :-( OK, I'm sending you the revised file in a separate email. I'll send the DAT file as an attachment, which, IIRC, is how you've said in the past that (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Working on new Parts Tracker
|
| Hi, y'all! I wanted to let you know I'm working on a new Parts Tracker. So far, "working" consists of doing some basic analysis around required functionality and UI. And asking Dan Boger if he could/would lend a hand with design and implementation. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
| (...) You realize you answered your own question? The spacing was inherited from James Jessiman, but it works better to have it there. If some programs/people don't want the spaces, it's easy enough to delete them. It would be more challenging to (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
| (...) This would do what you want, unless there was another, similar part, whose name is the same as the master part, except the final dimension included a fractional part, such as "... 2 & 1/3". Not that this is something that commonly collides (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
| (...) I agree with that because currently ldraw.org is working as l-cad.org, but l-cad.org will have to focus on other stuff as well. (...) I think it would be better to have the FAQ split, there should be a smaller FAQ with only questions that (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
