 | | Re: 6002 halfpart (Updated)
|
|
Thanks Mark! That one looks a lot better. My only complaint now is that the curvature on your 6002 is a hair different than the curvature on 2572( the 6x6x9 curved panel that matches 6002). This imperfection is visible as a jagged edge between the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting irregularities - Florida all over again?
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G4poL4.KA8@lugnet.com... (...) there. (...) But wait, you gotta make sure every vote counts. And you gotta count my votes twice, manually, even if they just pushed the radio button and didn't hit (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: To boldly MLCAD where no one has MLCADed before
|
|
"Jonathan Wilson" <jonwil@tpgi.com.au> wrote in message news:3A21B08C.D1B2EB....com.au... (...) You mean these little jewels? ;) (URL) B (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Fix for Trans - light - blue showing as trans-dark-blue in POV-RAY
|
|
Here is another sample of conversion to the "correct" color. Here is the original (with the darker trans-blue windows): (URL) is one with the trans-light-blue color corrected: (URL) this case, I think that the "incorrect" (i.e. dark blue) original (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting irregularities - Florida all over again?
|
|
That's funny, Since my model was up for voting, the thought of trying to stuff the votes did pop into the back of my head. I harnessed my morals though and registered my one and only vote (for my model). Actually, I kind of like the train model (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Monorail parts
|
|
Hi, where can I find monorail parts like monorail wheels, etc. ? Thanx. Norbi (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Light trans blue in MLCAD comes out as trans dark-blue in POV-RAY
|
|
Hi Larry, I just tried using 43 for 41 and it comes out looking way too green. I found the solution though. Check out my next post in lugnet.cad.ray! Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G4pro0.64M@lugnet.com... (...) The (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Fix for Trans - light - blue showing as trans-dark-blue in POV-RAY
|
|
I recently posted to lugnet.cad.ray asking for a solution to this problem. When you use L3p to convert .dat files to .pov, it seems to convert the trans-light-blue parts into trans-dark-blue. Based on the suggestions, I think I've isolated the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Light trans blue in MLCAD comes out as trans dark-blue in POV-RAY
|
|
(...) I'll give that a whirl, thanks very much!!!! However I would say this is "wrong" on the face of it, since it's counterintuitive. If this color 43 is really trans light blue, it ought to be named that in common usage, including within all the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: To boldly MLCAD where no one has MLCADed before [DAT]
|
|
(...) I almost directly quoted that. Like the previous person has said, i'd really like to see the dat. My 8880 is stashed away in my mom's closet MISB just waiting to be wrapped for Christmas... Quite so, I have looked, better yet tried to model an (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
