 | | Re: request on part(s)
|
|
(...) Alright, I'll make the Octan pattern tonight. -- Tore Eriksson Sweden ICQ: 76066510 LEGO: MOC++++ FS,SP,TO++ TC+ LS YB@m (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | request on part(s)
|
|
hello cad community. I am searching for a few good men... er i mean a few good parts.. dang typos! ok anyways.. there was the door that goes with the window part 6160 , as well as any octan decorated part. thanks in advance PS, here is a gallery for (...) (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: inner workings of the old-style cannon
|
|
In lugnet.pirates, Jonathan Gevaryahu writes all manner of interesting stuff on cannon assembly. Cool, thanks. Now I need wonder no more. I was never game to disassemble one for fear of ending up with one less cannon ;-) Richard Still baldly (...) (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView v0.7 Released ***
|
|
Travis Cobbs wrote... (...) I have also had second thoughts about the autocorrecting in L3Lab, when it is used for part inspection[1]. L3P and L3Lab share the input routines, which does several corrections. Some corrections are imperative to have (...) (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | new part/mock-up - 32083.dat - slope 45 4x6 double (mock-up) [DAT]
|
|
Howdy! I was encoding my modification of the B-wing fighter when I discovered that this part hadn't been encoded yet, so I did a quick-and-dirty mock-up of it. If anyone out there who is realtively new to Lego CAD wants to try their hand at encoding (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Troubles with MLCAD
|
|
Hi, I am a relatively new user of MLCAD, and have run into some very annoying problems. I started building my model, and went merrily on my way until I came to a shaft with several gears and bushings on it. I decided to group these items, because I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | inner workings of the old-style cannon
|
|
I dissassembled one of the old-style cannons (the kind with the black plunger which, on earlier models, could be pulled back) by pressing in the two small clips on the sides of tthe barrel. the contents are such: 1 base piece (with the mold number, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: an unusual request...
|
|
Hi Franklin, I looked on both a blue feather sprue and a red one and could not find any numbers on either. HTH! Maggie C. (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: an unusual request...
|
|
Ack phooey The number on the white headdress sprue is 6029, *NOT* 8029. Trying to read these tiny numbers first thing in the morning is painful. -Andy Lynch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Lynch" <andy@andyandjackie.com> To: (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
(...) Thanks for this comment. My computer is currently on the fritz¹², so I'll have to make these corrections at a later time and send them to Steve afterwards. Sorry about that. Fredrik __ ¹ Whereever does that idiom come from? ² See (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | A Happy Linux LeoCad User
|
|
All: I just installed LeoCad 0.71.2 under Red Hat 6.2 (Linux 2.2.12-20) with Mesa 3.2.1. I'm running on some fairly old hardware -- a 90MHz Pentium and an unaccelerated #9 GPX64-Pro w/2MB of video RAM. Mouse based operations are a little on the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: [updated] new lcad part - small feather/plume (castle/pirates)
|
|
(...) <snip> Looks pretty good to me - well done. Similar parts on sprues (like the 5 tools 6246.dat) have been numbered using a single letter suffix 9999a.dat, 9999b.dat etc. I guess I should now put some effort into finishing the forestmen cap, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: an unusual request...
|
|
(...) With there no visible number on the sprue, I'd say just go with numbering them P1, P2, P3, or some such thing, if you can put letters into the number. At least until you can find an official number. --Anthony (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | A couple of bug/feature notes
|
|
Hi Mike! When you input orientation/location info using the dialog box (accessed via the icon on the edit toolbar), the text boxes accept decimal data, but when you hit "Okay" the data is rounded back into integers. Also, when you double click on a (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: an unusual request...
|
|
(...) Um I can't seem to find a # on the sprue anywhere. anyone else have any luck? maybe it is real small. Now where did I put the microscope. John (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: an unusual request...
|
|
(...) Hmmm....after thoroughly examining a feather wheel for about 5 minutes or so, I can find no such number...strange, there's one on almost every other lego item.... -Chris (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: an unusual request...
|
|
(...) I have a number of plume-sprues of different sizes (I assume from different years), but none of them seem to be stamped with part numbers. - Mike. (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
