|
|
 | | Re: Can LDAO do this? (was: anyone interested in rendering for me?)
|
| (...) Yes, this should be perfectly appropriate. Perl would be a good tool to do this. Of course, it makes more sense to do this conversion in L3P to start with... If we can persuade Lars to do it! On the other hand, I don't like using POV-Ray to (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Part Command (1)
|
| (...) Absolutly! I couldn't agre more! -Chuck (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: THE POSTSCRIPT PROJECT
|
| Any luck yet? (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| | | | | Re: Planes & Requirements for a generic download-tool
|
| (...) Great to see someone is in sink with me ! I have been planning this for a while too ! (...) I was thinking more on the line of an update for the Oficial DATs, but this can be easilly extended if a config file for each program/library can be (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Part Command (1)
|
| (...) I personally am agaist this ! DAT/MPD files SHOULD be Compatible (NOT MUST BE), because people may have no desire to keep it's compatibility, it's a choice up to the user. This offcourse is only related with peoples models, NOT oficial parts, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
