|
|
 | | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
| (...) Haven't checked it, but I'm going on the principle that clone brands have printed items on their studs, and that we aren't saying 'LEGO' anywhere. I honestly do not believe this will be a problem. Just to be sure, I left Brad Justus a voice (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
| | | | | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
| We already have GMLTC shirts, through the work of John Neal. He is also working on ID cards for us all to wear, and banners with our logo and url to hang on or above the layout. John is our designated 'public relations' person! I'm really looking (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
| | | | | Re: We're on the itinerary!
|
| (...) Ooo. Have you checked the LDRAW-on-studs bit with TLC? Steve (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.events, lugnet.trains.org)
| | | | | Re: Fixed Part #2791- added edge ridges
|
| (...) Yes, if a part-file does have the standard L-CAD header lines, it was written by James. (...) It lookes good. I can't do a hard analysis on it right now -- I don't have one of these parts handy, for comparision. But I'll make a couple of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Kidvention: Part (6085) Needed!
|
| [response trimmed to lugnet.cad.dev -- is there anyone who reads one group under lugnet.cad.*, but not other groups?] (...) I'd guess it's orientation was chosen to place it in 'studs up' mode. (...) I'd start over, or check the code you're reusing (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
