 | | StarWars rendered images
|
|
I updated my StarWars rendered images at: (URL) X-Wing from set 7140. George (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray) !
|
| |
| | StarWars rendered images
|
|
I updated my StarWars rendered images at: (URL) with X-Wing from set 7140. George (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) Ooooh Solaris. Could you compile ldglite for Solaris and let me know what opengl extensions it lists? I think this is one of the platforms that supports the HP_OCCLUSION_TEST extension that I've been dying to try out. Sorry about butting in on (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: next ldraw part update, space/minifig accessories?
|
|
hi steve, and thanks for the response. i've been watching the voting thread. in your original announcement you said it would be a "fairly small update" of parts but that is one jam-packed update of great stuff! big thanks to you and all of the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) Since the goal is to maximize performance, wine/dosemu isn't really a desirable solution. KL (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) The server is running FreeBSD 3.2. Can you make a binary for that platform? How about Solaris 2.6/7 ? KL (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) I'd say it would be ok even then, imo. (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw Help Desk/Reference
|
|
Tim, I thought you once mentioned an 'under development' area on ldraw.org. Does this area exist, or am I mis-remembering? Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: next ldraw part update, space/minifig accessories?
|
|
(...) Yes. :) (...) At some point, the parts in the Castle, Town, and Space categories need to be reorganized, moved to other categories. Generally, the theme-based groups make parts harder to find. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
|
(...) There was a discussion about this awhile ago. Since LDraw will interpret these lines as subfile commands, the lines are syntactically correct. Badly formed, but not invalid. And 754.dat is getting fixed in the 2000-01 update! Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
