 | | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Well I have to congratulate you for the effort ! Has always, when asked to, you provide some nice output! ;) So now let's discuss it. Just reply to my previous replys to "LITS 2" mails. I have to say, that I'don't actually have time know to (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) I believe that the only problem is that these matrixes can't be inverted ! I'not sure if placing a one on the specific place has exactly the same graphic behaviour ? can someone confirm ? (...) Use my proposal: 0 CERTIFY BFC MTX where MTX is (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) I have to read this better to make an opinion, later ! (...) Now you don't like local clipping anymore ? too or tree mails before you were in favour or am I mistaken ? I should we make complicated spec for clipping, just because of one stupid (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: My first part: 2x8 tile
|
|
That's a good start. Do you know its part number? (...) Should be: 0 Tile 2 x 8 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
I read the current proposal, and I have this to say: I don't agree with the following paragraph when an entire branch has to have cliping on to be able to be culled, don't think so. ( I know about the invert case, solution required ) 4 Control of (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) I agree with the default from the start, I proposed them, somewhere ! (...) Agreed! but that's NOT currently written that way, is it ? (...) NO it is NOT ! read on. (...) I know that the branch only would be required, but I don't agree with (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | My first part: 2x8 tile [DAT]
|
|
Well, it was easy to make this. Alan 0 Plate 2 x 8 1 16 60 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 40 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 -20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Influencing what parts people work on
|
|
As you know, The Guild of Bricksmiths, (URL) a big user of LDraw compatible tools, since Guild members are producing instructions for almost all of their kits. From time to time a Guildsman runs into a part he or she would really like to use in a (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev) !
|
| |
| | Re: NEW PART: Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome [DAT]
|
|
Try this: 0 Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome 0 Name: x???.dat 0 Author: Kevin M Bane 4/02/2000 0 Un-Official Part 1 16 0 -4.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 -4.5 0 0 0 6 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat 2 24 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW PART: Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome [DAT]
|
|
Kevin B <kevinb01@netfocus.net> wrote in message news:FsEux1.Lp7@lugnet.com... (...) Well, I for one have a BIG problem with it! Looks like the ole "WordWrap" monster got me! Sorry folks! Let's try that one again! Kevin B 0 Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
