 | | Re: Website
|
|
(...) No problem :) I'm sure a lot of people will/have benefitted from your work. (...) Right now, I'm working as a Web designer... Sort of ID. I graduate in December, though. In the past ocuple of years, I've worked for an Architecture firm here in (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | which viewers are getting used?
|
|
Before I set up mime types for marsbase.com, I wanted to get an idea of where the comunity was in terms of which viewers were being used the most. That way, I can set it up for the largest audience. Well anyway, I set up a small web based survey to (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Website
|
|
(...) Augh, I knew you were in ID, I should have known you would know all about this stuff. Maybe someone else will benefit from the knowledge. (...) Yeah, multiple models are a pain--which is why for the older models on my site, there are only one (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Website
|
|
(...) Thanks. Wish I had the time...maybe if I do that senior project I'll need project ideas :) (...) Hey, it's the best way to learn :) (...) Aw, you're gonna make me blush ;) I hope I can find enough stuff to work on for 30 hours a week for 3 (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: 30358 nearly finished
|
|
(...) Ok, I'll see what I can do. Paul (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Website
|
|
(...) Thanks :) A little bit of constructive criticism on (...) Thanks, Bram. Although, I already new about this stuff. I work with Alias Studio on a daily basis, so I am very into rendering. The reason I went with straight defaults is that I was (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Website
|
|
(...) One might beg to differ. Your stuff looks much better than the majority of ours. In my perfect world, I could send you my MPDs and you'll return awesome renderings. :-, <SOUNDTRACK MODE="WEEPY-KITSCHY" INSTRUMENT="VIOLINS"> Alas, here in the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: microfig aerospace fighter
|
|
(...) There's no concrete scale for microfig, if that's what you mean. I use two different (and pretty much arbitrary) scales myself -- 341:1 and 115:1. Your microfig models tend to be closer to the latter scale. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader
|
|
(...) color 16 or 24; thanks for catching this for me. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Part request
|
|
About where is it on you todo list? Travis Dickinson (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
