 | | Re: Yet Another torso sticker question —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) He probably did. I don't know that there are very many printers at all today which aren't dot matrix printers. My HP 660Cse certainly is. My TI Microlaser certainly was. Of course not very many people today use printers which put the dots on (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Yet Another torso sticker question —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | Ooh! Ouch! The memories! I had a daisy-wheel printer for my (get this) Radio Shack/Tandy TRS-80 computers when I was a little kid (models I - V, Model 1000, CoCo)! I have to admit that that printer was probably what got me into design in the forst (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Yet Another torso sticker question —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) I don't think so. Only the ones with the little moving pins which hit the paper are called "dot matrix", even if the other ones do end up putting a matrix dots on the page. See: (2 URLs) (The "dot-matrix" doesn't refer to the image, but rather (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Yet Another torso sticker question —Jason Cicchini
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, I have a Lexmark Z3, and while this may not be a BONAFIDE dot matirx, the inkjet process is still close enough to dot matrix to suck just as much! Lol -Catch You Cats Later! -The Rascal King (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Yet Another torso sticker question —Jason Cicchini
|
| | | | (...) Actually, I have a Lexmark Z3, and while this may not be a BONAFIDE dot matirx, the inkjet process is still close enough to dot matrix to suck just as much! Lol -Catch You Cats Later! -The Rascal King (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
