Subject:
|
Re: Yet Another torso sticker question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 26 May 2001 14:56:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
110 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Matthew Miller writes:
> Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > He probably did. I don't know that there are very many printers at all
> > today which aren't dot matrix printers. My HP 660Cse certainly is. My TI
>
> I don't think so. Only the ones with the little moving pins which hit the
> paper are called "dot matrix", even if the other ones do end up putting a
> matrix dots on the page. See:
>
> <http://www.nightflight.com/foldoc-bin/foldoc.cgi?dot+matrix+printer>
> <http://www.nightflight.com/foldoc-bin/foldoc.cgi?non-impact+printer>
>
> (The "dot-matrix" doesn't efer to the image, but rather to the print head.)
Actually, I have a Lexmark Z3, and while this may not be a BONAFIDE dot matirx,
the inkjet process is still close enough to dot matrix to suck just as much!
Lol
-Catch You Cats Later!
-The Rascal King
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Yet Another torso sticker question
|
| (...) I don't think so. Only the ones with the little moving pins which hit the paper are called "dot matrix", even if the other ones do end up putting a matrix dots on the page. See: (2 URLs) (The "dot-matrix" doesn't refer to the image, but rather (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
