To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.minifigsOpen lugnet.build.minifigs in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Minifigs / 1489
1488  |  1490
Subject: 
Re: Some fun for Buffy and Angel fans (sorta long)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.parts.mod
Date: 
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 03:31:23 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
17882 times
  
Hi there,

I’ve been pondering the aesthetic issue. Last night I made a pyramid of Lego heads, illustrating the schema in Scott McCloud’s book, Understanding Comics. (See below)

McCloud’s schema for comic characters identifies three artistic poles which describe a triangle with variations in between the poles. These are realism, iconism, and abstract or what he calls “the picture plane”.

At one vertex of the triangle, the lower left, there is realism. At the the lower right is a classic smiley (you see where I went off on Lego) representing the simplest possible cartoon or icon. If you go any further off the right, you get into hieroglyphs, symbols, and language which is another realm.

At the top of the triangle is the abstract. Think Picasso: shapes that are barely recognizable: square eyes, missing halves of mouths, random squiggles indicating barely glimpsed shapes.

In the comics version, most characters you’d be familiar with are located somewhere along the bottom continuum, between total realism and classic smiley. As you go up the pyramid, shapes become exaggerated (funny animals) and distorted (Sergio Aragones) until they lapse into the unrecognizable.

The Lego version goes like this. Faces with noses go at the “realism” pole: American Indians, Harry Potter characters. You could put the flesh colors there, but I didn’t bother with those in my pyramid. Halfway toward “iconic” and slightly above it I have smileys with some facial hair and lipstick, and classic smiley is found in the very corner.

Going up, it gets trickier to make any sense, but I tried. Along the left, I morph from Indians to more widely spaced eyes, then exaggerated big mouths, then mummies, troll, robot, and finally a Martian. Going back down from Picture Plane toward Iconic, I place skeleton, happy cyborg, Arctic shades guy, plain sunglasses guy, freckled smiley, plain smiley with small mustache, then classic smiley.

In the center it’s the hardest to decide where to put heads. I have a group of bug-eyed minifigs in the middle, with Dr. Kilroy toward the realism side and Timmy toward the iconic side, right next to plain sunglasses guy. Below that are a lot of figs with more or less realistic hair.

I recommend Scott McCloud’s Understanding Comics to anyone who builds with Lego. It’s a tour of how to use comics to tell stories, told as a comic.

-Erik





Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Some fun for Buffy and Angel fans (sorta long)
 
(...) Cool! Someone else who knows McCloud (and Aragones!). D'you know, I've owned that book for years, and never made the connection to it being useful in thinking about Lego? Silly me... Anyway, well done, Erik. This is a usefully (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Some fun for Buffy and Angel fans (sorta long)
 
OK! I finished the second batch and even fit in tweaking some series one faces. I now have a whopping 51 unique faces (12 are alternate faces, so 39 unique figs). You guys raise some excellent points. First, the technical stuff about decal paper at (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.parts.mod)

17 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR