To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 1795
1794  |  1796
Subject: 
Re: The Flying Wing
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Tue, 18 May 2004 14:07:11 GMT
Viewed: 
55 times
  
In lugnet.adventurers, Christian Lindblad Rasmussen wrote:
In lugnet.adventurers, Chris Paton wrote:
In lugnet.adventurers, Christian Lindblad Rasmussen wrote:
However I think that the planform is too straight. The wings needs to be swept
back and maybe more tapering.

Hi Christian

You are absolutely right.  I think a little modification is needed.  Thanks for
your observation.

I'll probably take more pictures after modififying the wing.

Chris
It will tricky though. Sweep and taper is not easy to do. While you are at it,
more red on the tails please. And those might need to extend further aft. That
would also help soften the "straightness".

   Yes--the "straightness" was also my big concern.  The plane
   in Temple of Doom does look like a very heavily modified
   Horten wing, so if you dig around on Luft46 you should be
   able to get the specific geometries in drawings.  The Horten
   wings did not, however, have the variable vertical angle that
   the Lucasfilm one does, and that adds an additional dimension
   of annoyance for the builder.

   One thought would be to build SNOT--build the wings out from
   the sides.  That's tricky because getting good tensile strength
   is a challenge, but it would help from the standpoint of re-
   creating a gentler sweep.  Another option would be to use the
   2x2/1x4 plate hinges and some times to create a "pocket wing"
   leading edge, where the wing surfaces are simply plates but
   you have a leading and trailing edge totally untethered in
   their geometry.

   The sweeps of Second World War aircraft are the hardest things
   to match, in my opinion--it's why I haven't yet built an Arrow.

   all best

   LFB



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Flying Wing
 
Hi Lindsay Thanks for your comments and ideas. I have tried building wings with SNOT before with reasonable success: (URL) I hadn't thought about SNOT when I was building "the wing" but I think it would allow for more tapering. Bit worried about the (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-04, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.build.military)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Flying Wing
 
(...) It will tricky though. Sweep and taper is not easy to do. While you are at it, more red on the tails please. And those might need to extend further aft. That would also help soften the "straightness". Christian (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.build.military)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR