 | | Re: a second look?
|
|
(...) Keith, Whoa! Thanks for bringing this to my attention. There are MOC's here that could be highlighted well on their own, the big one looks very impressive, did it have fold up landing gear? All in all, a very well done MOC/site, something I (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another new MOC-A prototype spaceship
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) Overall it's really cool. Looks like it would be a cool ship to see in a movie come quickly swooping in & lift the cargo container off. The wings are a bit to long for my taste, BUT if there's no gravity assist, then you'd probably (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another new MOC-A prototype spaceship
|
|
(...) OK, here we go... I think the turret on the top would look better if both barrels were tied together (maybe it was just the one pic I looked at. The rest seemed to have the barrels elevated at the same angles). I don't think a gunner will have (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
<snipped> (...) Anthony -- I really like this idea. Partly because I've always thought that the Principality of Sealand was a rather ambitious and creative idea based on a British line of defenses from WWII. (URL) your idea is more akin to the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
"Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HGC3FD.1236@lugnet.com... (...) closer to 1 than 2. the towers haven't actually seen any action yet. they hate the crew-change because it means they have to pack up whatever (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
