 | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
"Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HG89LI.22FC@lugnet.com... (...) Kelvinisgrad (...) see (...) a (...) and (...) surface. no direct connection between the towers, no. I'm going to design a cargo submarine (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
(...) used (...) Why is that? Too comfy on the towers or just too dangerous? Andrew. (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
"Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HGC3FD.1236@lugnet.com... (...) closer to 1 than 2. the towers haven't actually seen any action yet. they hate the crew-change because it means they have to pack up whatever (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
(...) of (...) of (...) Hmmm. Sounds like they need one of two things: 1) Deployable helicopter landing pad that can retract like a drawbridge from the side of the tower. OR: 2) Cage with some medicine in it for the gerbils. I guess it really boils (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
"Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HGDxvB.205x@lugnet.com... (...) they (...) they (...) exception (...) trio (...) that's actually a very good idea... *looks at his technic pieces* and feasible, too! (...) oh (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
