To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 1200
1199  |  1201
Subject: 
Re: USS Duluth - Hull design innovation!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 01:13:14 GMT
Viewed: 
550 times
  
In lugnet.build.military, Richie Dulin writes:
In lugnet.build.military, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.build.military, Daniel Siskind writes:

Feedback is appreciated!

WOW! That is cool! I am suspecting that this technique won't work well for
cargo ships, or other hulls that have a lot of bow curvature but for
cruisers and destroyers which knife through the water it works really well.

I think it would tend to work better than SNOT for wider, more rounded
hulls; SNOT works well for narrow and pointy designs with a flattening
curve, but gets very 'stepped' if you try to widen the hull too much without
adding a *lot* of length.

This technique though, gives the possibility of generating curves which
aren't linked to plates per number of studs. And modern freighters tend to
have less vertical flare than warships. It has huge possibilities....

You'd probably have to use hinges along the hull to get the more rounded
hulls, which would make the construction somewhat more complex. You can only
bend LEGO so far....

I'd be interested to see Dan's ideas for big flared hulls though...

ROSCO



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: USS Duluth - Hull design innovation!
 
(...) True. I've experimented with very wide (32 stud) SNOT hulls (both for a modern tanker and a 19th century ship), but traditional SNOT just can't do it well. I then tried building the bow studs forward (curving back), and the sides studs outward (...) (22 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.military)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: USS Duluth - Hull design innovation!
 
(...) I think it would tend to work better than SNOT for wider, more rounded hulls; SNOT works well for narrow and pointy designs with a flattening curve, but gets very 'stepped' if you try to widen the hull too much without adding a *lot* of (...) (22 years ago, 9-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.military)

33 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR