 | | Re: MOC: Stealth Fighter Revealed
|
|
(...) GRRRR! Upstaged again... I too have been experimenting with 3-D lifting body shapes that don't suffer from the "jaggies." I wanted to be the first to display one, and you've beaten me to the punch. FANTASTIC work, John! -- John J. Ladasky Jr., (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Stealth Fighter Revealed
|
|
(...) Well, I don't think being first means much - the reward is all in the execution of each model. I'll be interested to see what you come up with for your lifting bodies. I'm sure there will be some new ideas that will inspire me to improve my (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Stealth Fighter Revealed
|
|
(...) No, yours is *great* the way it is! However, my approach to the problem of a lifting body is quite different. You may find it interesting, even if you don't use the ideas to improve your model. How's the mechanical strength of your Stealth (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Stealth Fighter Revealed
|
|
(...) The stiffness of the model seems OK. I can pick it up by the wings which seems to be the natural way to handle it anyway. I didn't reinforce the side engine intakes because I didn't want to tie everything down while I was still moving (...) (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
