 | | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
(...) My only complaint is that there aren't enough views! That's a fantastic model, and three pictures don't do it justice. The detail is wonderful; I especially like the supports for the treads and the use of the cylindrical engine in the front. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
How do you do [ everybody ]. You who were looking at my models, thank you. My new work "Sherman" was registered into BrickShelf . (URL) it adds later, please look forward to the new picture. I am waiting for your comment. (23 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
(...) I do, actually. It's not in my brickshelf account, yet. I need to redesign my whole web page but I just haven't made the time. (URL) the intro to the page. I did a cheesy diorama for it, as well. Just some things I had that I thought would fit (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | WWII Brikwars (was Re: Vought F-4 Corsair)
|
|
(...) Ahhhh :) Actually, Eric Joslin and I did exactly that last year (when I was just embarking upon my WWII modeling frenzy!). Eric did a fantastic 1950s-comic-book-style newsreel writeup[1]: (URL) thread in which we discuss the anachronistic (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
(...) Hey, you built an F-4 too? I didn't know that. Its not on your BrickShelf gallery - do you have pictures? (...) Actually, the 3-bladed prop is WW2-era accurate. The 4 bladed prop wasn't added onto the F-4 until it served as a ground attack / (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
(...) Drew!! From one F-4 builder to another, well done! I wish I had some of those black props for myself.. they look much better than the 3-blade prop I had to use on mine. Do the landing gear retract? I can't really tell from the pictures, but it (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) It sure does--thanks to all. I just needed a graphic explanation of how the engine stroked. :) I've always passed Angelucci up, only because he goes for breadth over depth. But for comparative discussion that's more valuable, no doubt about (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) I have two great books I found at Borders Books a few weeks ago. They are the "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft" and "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Civil Aircraft" both by Enzo Angelucci. Between these two books they have most every (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
|
|
(...) Try this link, (URL) . I did a search on Gnome rotary, as that was the most famous one I can think of. In short, the cylinders and crankcase rotate around the hollow, offcenter crankshaft. The intake valve is in the bottom of the piston, and (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
My latest creation is a Vought F-4 Corsair. This is my first attempt at a real WW2 color scheme, and I'm quite pleased with the results. I used every single blue slope I own in the Corsair's long nose. Unfortunantly, I sacrificed a few details in (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
