 | | Re: Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
|
|
(...) (Does little happy dance) Wheee! Praise from the master! Soren (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
|
|
This kinda works for me. Try to catch that Sky Captain trailer again. Your Nighthawk reminds me of one of those flapping bad guy planes. Fradel (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) Funny you mention the flatness of the underside, that's actually what I was going for. A little bit of layering, but otherwise flat. Glad you noticed :) I like the colors too, originally it was all grey, dark grey & black, but the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) I did try smaller wingflaps, but the (URL) 4x4> ones seemed too stubby. If only there was a 6x4 to go with the (URL) 8x4> Ah well, lack of parts can sometimes lead to interesting comprimises :) Funny that in the previous version (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
|
|
(...) A definite working out of the design to a smoother product that fits into the Crimson Skies category, if perhaps on the futuristic like the Guardian. The only other thing I could think of is to give the underside a little more substance. Not (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
|
|
(...) Hey, some nice changes you've done. I still think the nose area throws it off, but the piston engine and the big clunky machine guns go a long way toward making it look more Crimson Skies era. The only other suggestion I would have is to use (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
|
|
Reintroducing the NightHawk (3 URLs) After Mod> Thanks to some helpful criticism from the Grand Admiral, I sat down and revised the NightHawk. Originally I felt it was maybe "too futuristic" for Crimson Skies, and while the changes didn't blunt the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
|
|
(...) SUPERB!!..Love the gallery! (21 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
|
|
(...) Mmmm...tank-y goodness. The use of the bionicle mask on the light tank is interesting. Cheers, -G (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
|
|
In the words of those Guiness guys, BRILLIANT! Beyond that, I don't have a lot to say...yadda yadda great details....yadda yadda nice rack....yadda yadda...keep building. I really dig the contours of the turret, and all the delicious weapons. It (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Saddam Captured!!!
|
|
(...) Alternate Timeline, LOL!!! :p :D (URL) still not finished with any of the CZ-GC armies, their buildings, urban combat areas, and of course the military vehicles (all still in prototype forms). I would've been done with the R.P.'s main battle (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
|
|
(...) That's a lovely piece of microscale work there, Mark. Sometimes building on a small scale like this is far harder than building big. Very nicely done. Now where are the microfig scale f-14's for the deck? :) Adrian (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) hmmm, bulkier, more primitive guns, I think I can manage that :) thanks for the input! TRS (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
|
|
For your viewing pleasure, more tasty hardware from the Ceti Republic: Cougar II A1: (URL) (New cupola, extra sensor gear.) Lynx Armored Vehicle: (URL) (Variants shown are Mortar Carrier and Battlefield Command systems.) Jaguar Light Tank: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
|
|
For your viewing pleasure, more tasty hardware from the Ceti Republic: Cougar II A1: (URL) (New cupola, extra sensor gear.) Lynx Armored Vehicle: (URL) (Variants shown are Mortar Carrier and Battlefield Command systems.) Jaguar Light Tank: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
|
|
(...) That's excellent! The shape is spot on and the little details are wonderful...ie. the command tower and the peek into the hanger from the aft. Very cool! Cheers, -Gil (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) I don't think it's the shape of your plane that makes it a stretch for CS as much as it's the high-tech looking weaponry. Exchange that stuff for some large primitive looking machine guns and I think you'd be a lot closer to the CS style... (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) While I like Andrews plane, and can see where you classify it as 'conventional', my question is - how unconventional is too unconventional? I know this borders on threadjacking or bumping, but I've been wondering if my (URL) latest bird> was (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
|
|
(...) I just saw this looking around on brickshelf yesterday, and was very impressed. I like that you managed to capture the shape of the carrier in a relatively small MOC. Daniel Rubin (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) Not really. I don't think you understand what I was trying to point out. Your plane follows the very typical composition with two large wings forward, with a standard tail design. It looks like any given forward-prop-driven plane dating from (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
