To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / *1658 (-20)
  Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
 
This kinda works for me. Try to catch that Sky Captain trailer again. Your Nighthawk reminds me of one of those flapping bad guy planes. Fradel (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
 
(...) -snip- (...) Funny you mention the flatness of the underside, that's actually what I was going for. A little bit of layering, but otherwise flat. Glad you noticed :) I like the colors too, originally it was all grey, dark grey & black, but the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
 
(...) -snip- (...) I did try smaller wingflaps, but the (URL) 4x4> ones seemed too stubby. If only there was a 6x4 to go with the (URL) 8x4> Ah well, lack of parts can sometimes lead to interesting comprimises :) Funny that in the previous version (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
 
(...) A definite working out of the design to a smoother product that fits into the Crimson Skies category, if perhaps on the futuristic like the Guardian. The only other thing I could think of is to give the underside a little more substance. Not (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
 
(...) Hey, some nice changes you've done. I still think the nose area throws it off, but the piston engine and the big clunky machine guns go a long way toward making it look more Crimson Skies era. The only other suggestion I would have is to use (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Crimson Skies - NightHawk v.2
 
Reintroducing the NightHawk (3 URLs) After Mod> Thanks to some helpful criticism from the Grand Admiral, I sat down and revised the NightHawk. Originally I felt it was maybe "too futuristic" for Crimson Skies, and while the changes didn't blunt the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX)  
 
  Re: Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
 
(...) SUPERB!!..Love the gallery! (21 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
 
(...) Mmmm...tank-y goodness. The use of the bionicle mask on the light tank is interesting. Cheers, -G (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
 
In the words of those Guiness guys, BRILLIANT! Beyond that, I don't have a lot to say...yadda yadda great details....yadda yadda nice rack....yadda yadda...keep building. I really dig the contours of the turret, and all the delicious weapons. It (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Lego Saddam Captured!!!
 
(...) Alternate Timeline, LOL!!! :p :D (URL) still not finished with any of the CZ-GC armies, their buildings, urban combat areas, and of course the military vehicles (all still in prototype forms). I would've been done with the R.P.'s main battle (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
(...) That's a lovely piece of microscale work there, Mark. Sometimes building on a small scale like this is far harder than building big. Very nicely done. Now where are the microfig scale f-14's for the deck? :) Adrian (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) hmmm, bulkier, more primitive guns, I think I can manage that :) thanks for the input! TRS (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
 
For your viewing pleasure, more tasty hardware from the Ceti Republic: Cougar II A1: (URL) (New cupola, extra sensor gear.) Lynx Armored Vehicle: (URL) (Variants shown are Mortar Carrier and Battlefield Command systems.) Jaguar Light Tank: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX)
 
  Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
 
For your viewing pleasure, more tasty hardware from the Ceti Republic: Cougar II A1: (URL) (New cupola, extra sensor gear.) Lynx Armored Vehicle: (URL) (Variants shown are Mortar Carrier and Battlefield Command systems.) Jaguar Light Tank: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
(...) That's excellent! The shape is spot on and the little details are wonderful...ie. the command tower and the peek into the hanger from the aft. Very cool! Cheers, -Gil (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) I don't think it's the shape of your plane that makes it a stretch for CS as much as it's the high-tech looking weaponry. Exchange that stuff for some large primitive looking machine guns and I think you'd be a lot closer to the CS style... (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) While I like Andrews plane, and can see where you classify it as 'conventional', my question is - how unconventional is too unconventional? I know this borders on threadjacking or bumping, but I've been wondering if my (URL) latest bird> was (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
(...) I just saw this looking around on brickshelf yesterday, and was very impressed. I like that you managed to capture the shape of the carrier in a relatively small MOC. Daniel Rubin (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) Not really. I don't think you understand what I was trying to point out. Your plane follows the very typical composition with two large wings forward, with a standard tail design. It looks like any given forward-prop-driven plane dating from (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
I feel kindah silly replying to my own post, but I want to let you all know that I uploaded more pictures to the Brickshelf gallery, and I also updated the MOCpages site. (URL) Gallery: (URL) some people want to know if I'm going to make a mini (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.build.microscale)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR