To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 6914
6913  |  6915
Subject: 
Re: Mech grammar
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:55:17 GMT
Viewed: 
2187 times
  
One would use the term 'mech' when one is refering to the design of another
builder. The term 'mecha' comes into usage when in reference to a specific
style that the 'mech' has (i.e. piloted, worker, assult, ect.)
Does that clear things up for you?


In lugnet.build.mecha, Ross Crawford writes:
OK, you builders of mecha. I'm the first to admit I know nothing about them,
but I was just wanting to appease my enquiring mind. After reading quite a
few posts here, I've seen "mech" and "mecha" used almost interchangeably. I
always thought "mech" was singular, and "mecha" plural. Can someone please
enlighten me about the correct usage?

Thanks

ROSCO

(Just call me hoarder of useless grammar info)



Message is in Reply To:
  Mech grammar
 
OK, you builders of mecha. I'm the first to admit I know nothing about them, but I was just wanting to appease my enquiring mind. After reading quite a few posts here, I've seen "mech" and "mecha" used almost interchangeably. I always thought "mech" (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)

12 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR