To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 6914
6913  |  6915
Subject: 
Re: Mech grammar
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:55:17 GMT
Viewed: 
3302 times
  
One would use the term 'mech' when one is refering to the design of another
builder. The term 'mecha' comes into usage when in reference to a specific
style that the 'mech' has (i.e. piloted, worker, assult, ect.)
Does that clear things up for you?


In lugnet.build.mecha, Ross Crawford writes:
> OK, you builders of mecha. I'm the first to admit I know nothing about them,
> but I was just wanting to appease my enquiring mind. After reading quite a
> few posts here, I've seen "mech" and "mecha" used almost interchangeably. I
> always thought "mech" was singular, and "mecha" plural. Can someone please
> enlighten me about the correct usage?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> ROSCO
> 
> (Just call me hoarder of useless grammar info)



Message is in Reply To:
  Mech grammar
 
OK, you builders of mecha. I'm the first to admit I know nothing about them, but I was just wanting to appease my enquiring mind. After reading quite a few posts here, I've seen "mech" and "mecha" used almost interchangeably. I always thought "mech" (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)

12 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR