To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 6911
6910  |  6912
Subject: 
Re: Mech grammar
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:47:51 GMT
Viewed: 
2200 times
  
Hey Rosco! I would say the the terms "Mech" and Mecha" are the same except
for the sytle of the Robot in question. Mark Nuemann put it best by saying :

Mechs are lumbering giant war machines with grease and oil stains.

Mecha are beautiful sculpted creations more ornate in design.

Also, Mech,Mechs, and Mecha are either plural or singluar and refer to a
single entity or class of Robots.

When you use the word "Mecha" as a singular, it not only refers to the
individual Robot but more over it makes reference to the overall type of
Robot being referred to in the convo, or to the mechanized breed.

I guess that's it.

Two (1/2) things to keep in mind if that's confusing.

Mech - Singular
Mechs - Plural - Traditional Battle Machines
Mecha - Plural - Singular - Refers to kind or type can be used for a single
or muliple reference.

Legomaster



Message is in Reply To:
  Mech grammar
 
OK, you builders of mecha. I'm the first to admit I know nothing about them, but I was just wanting to appease my enquiring mind. After reading quite a few posts here, I've seen "mech" and "mecha" used almost interchangeably. I always thought "mech" (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)

12 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR