Subject:
|
Re: Mech grammar
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:18:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3389 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark Neumann has a very good explanation on his page:
http://home.attbi.com/~ravenswolfmk/mech/mech.htm
mech = anything here: http://www.legomc.com/
mecha = http://www3.sympatico.ca/mladenpejic/Mecha.htm
So a mech is more like Battletech, with a large, bulky profile while mecha
are usually more sleek in comparison.
I'm guessing that the plural form of "mech" would be "mechs", but I could be
wrong. The plural of "mecha" is "mecha".
HTH
-Geordan-
In lugnet.build.mecha, Ross Crawford writes:
> OK, you builders of mecha. I'm the first to admit I know nothing about them,
> but I was just wanting to appease my enquiring mind. After reading quite a
> few posts here, I've seen "mech" and "mecha" used almost interchangeably. I
> always thought "mech" was singular, and "mecha" plural. Can someone please
> enlighten me about the correct usage?
>
> Thanks
>
> ROSCO
>
> (Just call me hoarder of useless grammar info)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Mech grammar
|
| OK, you builders of mecha. I'm the first to admit I know nothing about them, but I was just wanting to appease my enquiring mind. After reading quite a few posts here, I've seen "mech" and "mecha" used almost interchangeably. I always thought "mech" (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
