Subject:
|
Re: MTM-168
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:14:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1123 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.build.mecha, Mark Neumann wrote:
|
In lugnet.build.mecha, Marco Tagliaferri wrote:
|
SNIP
Beside that I have to admit I wouldnt have recognized the MTM-168 as a
Neumann. Where did you hide those chicken legs?
|
heh, Im a tricky one aint I?
|
Sure you are! BTW who did you build the joint conecting the tread to the body?
|
|
Where did you get all those chain parts from?
|
I steal them from other SEALUG members.... I mean... uh, damn. No, Ive been
collecting them for a while. Its a combination of old parts, Pitsco, and
the newest SW sets. (when you consider a Pitsco pack of 36 links=$10 and a
Wookie Attack comes with 71 in a $30 set... That means 2/3rds of the value
of that set is tank tread links! So, get the set 20% off... yeah man.)
|
Never looked at it this way.
Keep building
Marco
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: MTM-168
|
| (...) The final joint to the body has two technic 1x2 bricks with axle holes (URL) There's a 4l axle running through both of them capped with technic balls on either side. Then I used plate hinges (URL)+(URL) to sandwich the technic 1x2 bricks and (...) (19 years ago, 27-Oct-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: MTM-168
|
| (...) heh, I'm a tricky one ain't I? (...) Thanks (...) I steal them from other SEALUG members.... I mean... uh, damn. No, I've been collecting them for a while. It's a combination of old parts, Pitsco, and the newest SW sets. (when you consider a (...) (19 years ago, 26-Oct-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|