Subject:
|
Re: Mobile Anti-Aircraft Platform MAAP-210
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:52:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
783 times
|
| |
|
|
Nicely done Allister. You stay true to your word. I like that. :-)
I think you did an excellent job overall. In fact, some of the things, like the
Technic leg joints look like an improvement over my almost fanatical use of
click-joints. I’m sad to hear that it’s flimsy though...
What you should have done was to make the legs much more vertical. This is the
ONLY way to make large, stable MPs. This is one of the reasons I gave up
on the spider-style legs. The other reason is because I think the “steeply
angled”-legs make MPs look more vicious and present a smaller, narrower
target.
My only real criticism is the turret on top. It looks slapped on and further
ruins the sleekness I would try to achieve in my MPs. It sorta made me think of
the following...
Your MP is like a
KV2.
My MPs are T34s.
And the KV-2 was one tough nut to crack (it had ~100mm armour, a tough nut even
for the 88s), so don’t think I’m insulting you. :-)
Keep up the good work Allister.
Mladen Pejic
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Mobile Anti-Aircraft Platform MAAP-210
|
| (...) God Mladen, just rip out poor Allister's heart and poor salt on the wound. Its these sorts of insults that make Lugnet no more fun. haha. just kidding. i actually see the difference you're raising, between the KV-2 and the T-34. I'm sure I (...) (20 years ago, 28-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
