Subject:
|
Re: Bucke Wheel Excavator (ISCC entry)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.contests
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:56:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1614 times
|
| |
|
|
"Holger Matthes" <matthes@fh-aachen.de> wrote in message news:GpBz8s.KKu@lugnet.com...
> I know the advantages of crawler to carry huge weights on slippery ground. The
> problem in the model are the technic axles. The Motor is strong enough, but the
> way the "power" goes is to long and there are to many 16 tooth gears to change
> directions. But the space to but the motor closer down to the crawlers is very
> limited.
>
> But I will try, good to know, that you were able to move 10 kg on Technic
> crawlers. (Before I finished the model with all "decorating stuff" it used to
> work well.)
Aha ... so it is the drive train that fails. The drive train I used on my model was
fairly compact and entirely contained in the crawlers. The key part was a
worm gear meshing with a 40-tooth gear in a Throwbot (Slizer) gearbox. This
combination allows large mechanical advantage in a small space. Pictures and
details can be found here:
http://www.geocities.com/markhaye/kd_crawl.html
--
Mark Haye, markhaye2(at)home(dot)com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bucke Wheel Excavator (ISCC entry)
|
| (...) realistic (...) Thanks! (...) what (...) that can't (...) the (...) rode (...) the (...) enormous (...) made (...) I know the advantages of crawler to carry huge weights on slippery ground. The problem in the model are the technic axles. The (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.contests)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
