Subject:
|
Re: When Bricks Go Bad!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 01:15:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
469 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <GGMtn1.7Dx@lugnet.com>,
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote:
> Really? I can't imagine that people are actually willing to accept elements
> that show this level of damage. Am I wrong about this? Do I stand alone in
> this regard?
>
> What I mean is, if you just paid $260 for Skull's Eye Schooner and the
> elements were in this kind of chewed up condition -- that would would be okay?
While I certainly wouldn't be happy if I bought a set with elements in
that condition, I have absolutely no intention of getting rid of the
elements already in my collection that are chewed. They date back to
before my dark age, some to early childhood, and have sentimental value.
--
Mark D. McKean - The Quantum Panda - qpanda@quantumpanda.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: When Bricks Go Bad!
|
| (...) Indeed, in documenting kinds of damage my intent is not so much to document stuff like "Woah, look what happened to this piece when I put it in the microwave!" but rather just to document the kinds of damage one normally sees, especially with (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.build)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
